When assessing the abdomen, the nurse would expect to auscultate which sounds?
Friction rubs
Crepitus
Bruits
High pitched gurgling
The Correct Answer is D
A) Friction rubs: These sounds are typically heard over the liver or spleen and indicate inflammation of the peritoneal surface. They are not standard findings during routine abdominal auscultation and are more specific to certain conditions.
B) Crepitus: This term refers to a crackling or popping sound often associated with joint movement or subcutaneous air and is not related to abdominal auscultation. It is not something a nurse would expect to hear when listening to bowel sounds.
C) Bruits: These are abnormal sounds that indicate turbulent blood flow, typically assessed over blood vessels rather than the abdomen itself. While they can be detected in some abdominal conditions, they are not the primary sounds expected during routine abdominal auscultation.
D) High pitched gurgling: This is characteristic of normal bowel sounds and indicates active peristalsis. High-pitched, gurgling sounds are a common finding during abdominal auscultation, reflecting the movement of gas and fluids in the intestines. This is what the nurse would expect to hear when assessing the abdomen.
Free Nursing Test Bank
- Free Pharmacology Quiz 1
- Free Medical-Surgical Quiz 2
- Free Fundamentals Quiz 3
- Free Maternal-Newborn Quiz 4
- Free Anatomy and Physiology Quiz 5
- Free Obstetrics and Pediatrics Quiz 6
- Free Fluid and Electrolytes Quiz 7
- Free Community Health Quiz 8
- Free Promoting Health across the Lifespan Quiz 9
- Free Multidimensional Care Quiz 10
View Related questions
Correct Answer is C
Explanation
A) Low self-esteem: While low self-esteem can develop as a result of limitations in physical abilities, it is not the most immediate concern in this scenario. Addressing the patient's functional capabilities and safety takes precedence.
B) His complaints of numbness in his hands: Numbness is a significant symptom of carpal tunnel syndrome, but the immediate priority is to ensure the patient can safely perform tasks. While it is important to address his symptoms, managing the risk associated with his condition is more critical.
C) Risk for injury: This is the most pressing concern for the patient. Given his difficulty holding tools, there is a heightened risk of accidents or injuries while working. Prioritizing safety measures is essential to prevent harm and ensure he can continue his work safely.
D) Persistent pain: While pain management is important, the focus should be on the immediate risk of injury related to the patient's inability to hold tools securely. Addressing safety concerns takes precedence over managing pain at this point.
Correct Answer is B
Explanation
A) Left extremity cool to touch, normal pitting edema, with femoral, posterior tibial, and dorsalis pedis pulses palpable, +2: While this option describes the left extremity and includes some relevant details, it inaccurately uses "normal pitting edema" without specifying the degree of edema clearly. Additionally, it lists the posterior tibial pulse instead of the popliteal, which is more appropriate given the anatomical location.
B) Left lower extremity cool to touch, +2 pitting edema, with femoral, popliteal, and dorsalis pedis pulses palpable, +2: This documentation accurately describes the left lower extremity, specifies the degree of edema as "+2," and correctly identifies the relevant pulses as femoral, popliteal, and dorsalis pedis. This terminology is clear and concise, providing a comprehensive assessment of the vascular status.
C) Left lower leg cool to touch, +4 edema with femoral, posterial tibial, dorsalis and pedis pulses normal: This option incorrectly reports the degree of edema as "+4," which indicates severe swelling, not matching the original assessment of "mild edema." It also incorrectly lists the posterior tibial pulse, which should be popliteal.
D) Left lower leg normal cool temperature, slight swelling, femoral, posterior tibial and dorsalis pedis pulses normal: The term "normal cool temperature" is confusing and not standard terminology. Additionally, "slight swelling" lacks specificity regarding the degree of edema, which is important for a clinical assessment. Furthermore, it inaccurately refers to the posterior tibial pulse instead of the popliteal.